![]() ![]() ![]() Here, former President Kennedyuses antithesis with inverting statements, to show that America will not be threatened by opposition, but at the same time, will be willing to negotiate. "Let us never negotiate out of fear, but let us never fear to negotiate." –JFK Inaugural Address By having the “more” repeated, Reagan emphasizes also that, despite this tragedy, the quest into space will not stop. By putting “more” before every different group of people he mentions, he creates equal importance between all of them and to show that many more different kinds of people will go into space. Nothing ends here our hopes and our journeys continue.” -Ronald Reagan- The Space Shuttle "Challenger" Tragedy Addressįormer President Reagan uses anaphora here by repeatedly saying “more” before saying a different group of people. There will be more shuttle flights and more shuttle crews and, yes, more volunteers, more civilians, more teachers in space. The people who fought for freedom died to give the dreamer rights, and Johnson uses analogy to show that by denying the dreamer, you dishonor the hero’s sacrifice. He compares the two people in order to show the connection between the dreamer and the dead who gave their lives for American freedom. Here, Johnson uses analogy to say that to deny a man because of race is to dishonor the dead who gave their lives for American freedom. ![]() “To apply any other test - to deny a man his hopes because of his color, or race, or his religion, or the place of his birth is not only to do injustice, it is to deny America and to dishonor the dead who gave their lives for American freedom.” -Lyndon Baines Johnson- "We Shall Overcome" By using amplification on his first idea, he places greater emphasis on peace and unity: the big picture of what he is trying to say. As he repeats the phrase for a second and third time, he adds on that all sides of the word should succeed together in scientific discoveries and other accomplishments. When says “let both sides” for the first time, Kennedy explains that he wishes for unity instead of division. The repetition of “let both sides” in former President Kennedy’s speech amplifies his desire for peace and unity. Together let us explore the stars, conquer the deserts, eradicate disease, tap the ocean depths, and encourage the arts and commerce.” -JFK Inaugural Address Let both sides seek to invoke the wonders of science instead of its terrors. Let both sides, for the first time, formulate serious and precise proposals for the inspection and control of arms, and bring the absolute power to destroy other nations under the absolute control of all nations. “Let both sides explore what problems unite us instead of belaboring those problems which divide us. He uses this allusion to connect one tragedy to another, but also to show that the “Challenger” crew should be honored in the same way as Sir Francis Drake because of their dedication. Here, former President Reagan uses an allusion to reference the “Challenger” crew to Sir Francis Drake. In his lifetime the great frontiers were the oceans, and a historian later said, ‘He lived by the sea, died on it, and was buried in it.’ Well, today, we can say of the “Challenger” crew: Their dedication was, like Drake's, complete.” -Ronald Reagan- The Space Shuttle "Challenger" Tragedy Address On this day three hundred and ninety years ago, the great explorer Sir Francis Drake died aboard ship off the coast of Panama. ![]() He cited voters he interviewed who “tried to make sense of the arguments of the candidates ‘but the more we listened, the more confused we got.“There's a coincidence today. Or was the knack of merely seeming well-informed what counted with the viewer?” Public opinion expert Samuel Lubell came to a similar conclusion. “Not even a trained political observer,” noted the journalist Douglass Cater, who moderated one debate, “could keep up with the crossfire of fact and counterfact, of the rapid references to Rockefeller Reports, Lehman amendments, prestige analyses, GNP and a potpourri of other so-called facts. For them, the problem with the debates lay not in their lack of substance but in the rapid-fire barrage of information-rich answers, which made it hard for viewers to take some kind of broader measure of the two men. For all the laments that Kennedy and Nixon postured excessively, or that TV focused too much on smiles and stubble, many analysts assessed the contests differently. Ironically, though, at the time of the debates, not everyone agreed that the candidates shortchanged a discussion of the issues. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |